Same Brain, Different Prediction: How Preprocessing Choices Undermine EEG Decoding Reliability
Published in arXiv preprint, 2026
EEG deep learning predictions are unstable across preprocessing pipelines. Across six datasets spanning four paradigms, up to 42% of trial-level predictions flip when only the preprocessing changes — same data, same model, same subject. We introduce three contributions: (i) a Walsh-Hadamard decomposition that reveals near-additive sensitivity patterns across pipeline components, (ii) Preprocessing Uncertainty as a diagnostic metric for per-trial reliability, and (iii) Normalized Adaptive PGI as a regularization strategy that mitigates pipeline-induced instability.
Recommended citation: Hou, D., Wu, Z., Jiang, L., Li, Z., Lin, F., & Yamada, K. D. (2026). Same Brain, Different Prediction: How Preprocessing Choices Undermine EEG Decoding Reliability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.07212.
Download Paper